Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 3:47:55 GMT
Supreme Court of Appe. The plaintiff husband's divorce case is based exclusively on the reason of "living a dishonorable life" (TCC Art. 163). In order to be able to talk about the existence of a dishonorable life and to decide on divorce for this reason; The spouse's behavior in social life, which is considered negative and conflicts with the general value judgments of the society, must be continuous and this behavior must make living together impossible for the other spouse. A one-time behavior that does not show continuity; Although it may be sufficient for the situation where the marriage union is shaken from its foundations as stated in Article 166 of the Turkish Civil Code, it is not sufficient for a divorce decision based on the reason of leading a dishonorable life.
Tt is understood from the evidence collected that the France Telegram Number Data defendant woman was talking and messaging with another man on her mobile phone. Supreme Court of Appe. The plaintiff husband's divorce case is based exclusively on the reason of "living a dishonorable life" (TCC Art. 163). In order to be able to talk about the existence of a dishonorable life and to decide on divorce for this reason; The spouse's behavior in social life, which is considered negative and conflicts with the general value judgments of the society, must be continuous and this behavior must make living together impossible for the other spouse.
A one-time behavior that does not show continuity; Although it may be sufficient for the situation where the marriage union is shaken from its foundations as stated in Article 166 of the Turkish Civil Code, it is not sufficient for a divorce decision based on the reason of leading a dishonorable life. It is understood from the evidence collected that the defendant woman was talking and messaging with another man on her mobile phone.
Tt is understood from the evidence collected that the France Telegram Number Data defendant woman was talking and messaging with another man on her mobile phone. Supreme Court of Appe. The plaintiff husband's divorce case is based exclusively on the reason of "living a dishonorable life" (TCC Art. 163). In order to be able to talk about the existence of a dishonorable life and to decide on divorce for this reason; The spouse's behavior in social life, which is considered negative and conflicts with the general value judgments of the society, must be continuous and this behavior must make living together impossible for the other spouse.
A one-time behavior that does not show continuity; Although it may be sufficient for the situation where the marriage union is shaken from its foundations as stated in Article 166 of the Turkish Civil Code, it is not sufficient for a divorce decision based on the reason of leading a dishonorable life. It is understood from the evidence collected that the defendant woman was talking and messaging with another man on her mobile phone.